87,673 verified reviews · 4.95 average · every one published in full, unedited, nothing filtered by rating
Review archive

Answered from 87,673 customer reviews

Are BJJ Fanatics instructionals for gi or no-gi?

Both, title by title. 2,691 reviews mention the gi or no-gi, rating 4.95. 1,769 name no-gi explicitly, 99 discuss gi grips and lapels, and 60 say the material transfers between the two. Leg locks, wrestling and takedowns come up in 342 of them, which is where the no-gi side of the catalogue runs deepest.

What the evidence shows

The catalogue covers both, so the useful question is whether a given instructional transfers. 60 reviews address that directly, at 4.97 average.

342 of these reviews mention leg locks, wrestling or takedowns, the areas where the no-gi catalogue is deepest. 33 state that their purchase applies to one ruleset only, which is the warning worth reading before buying.

How the matching reviews are rated

The 2,691 matching reviews sit at 4.95 on average, against 4.95 for the archive as a whole. 0 of them carry one or two stars.

5 star2,560 (95%)
4 star125 (4.6%)
3 star6 (0.2%)
2 star0 (0%)
1 star0 (0%)

Evidence table

Each row counts, among the 2,691 matching reviews, how many contain a phrase pattern for that theme. One review can satisfy several patterns and then appears under each of them, which is why the column does not add up. Rows are ordered by count.

Phrase patterns found in reviews matching “Are BJJ Fanatics instructionals gi or no-gi?
What the review saysReviewsShareAverage rating
Mentions no-gi specifically1,76966%4.95
Mentions leg locks or wrestling34213%4.94
Mentions gi grips, lapels or collars993.7%4.91
Says the material crosses over between gi and no-gi602.2%4.97
Says it is gi only or no-gi only331.2%4.91

What positive reviewers wrote

Reproduced in full, exactly as submitted. These come from the 2,685 matching reviews rated four or five stars, 100% of the set.

What critical reviewers wrote

The same question, taken from the 6 matches at three stars or under. Published unedited and at the same length as the positive ones, because an archive that quotes only praise is not worth reading.

Other questions